Let it be considered, that this argument goes as strongly against connivance, which you allow, as against toleration, which you reject.
Edmund Burke: “Let it be considered, that this argument goes as strongly against connivance, which you allow, as against toleration…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke asserts that the argument against toleration also applies to the concept of connivance.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Their trust for the future preservation of the Constitution was not in future revolutions.
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
Who could doubt but that, at any expense to the state, of which they understood nothing, they must pursue their private interests, which they understood but too well?





