Could a man think such an objection possible, if he had not actually heard it made,--an objection contradicted, not by hypothetical reasonings, but the clear evidence of the most decisive facts?
Burke challenges the validity of objections against societal superstitions with factual evidence.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
Ill would our ancestors at the Revolution have deserved their fame for wisdom, if they had found no security for their freedom, but in rendering their government feeble in its operations and precarious in its tenure,--if they had been able…
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
Other voices in this conversation
