It was of importance to the lord that the person who received the feud should be submissive to him; he had, therefore, a right to interfere in the marriage of the heiress who inherited the feud.
Edmund Burke: “It was of importance to the lord that the person who received the feud should be submissive to him; he had, therefore, a…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke explains the lord's right to interfere in the marriages of heiresses.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Their trust for the future preservation of the Constitution was not in future revolutions.
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
Who could conceive that men who are habitually meddling, daring, subtle, active, of litigious dispositions and unquiet minds, would easily fall back into their old condition of obscure contention, and laborious, low, and unprofitable…
No experience has taught us that in any other course or method than that of an hereditary crown our liberties can be regularly perpetuated and preserved sacred as our hereditary right.





