How could they believe themselves free and sovereign, when we made them take such an oath as we thought fit, as a test to give them the right of voting?
Edmund Burke: “How could they believe themselves free and sovereign, when we made them take such an oath as we thought fit, as a test…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke questions the legitimacy of a forced oath that undermines the freedom of those being governed.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The ceremony of cashiering kings, of which these gentlemen talk so much at their ease, can rarely, if ever, be performed without force.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
Always acting as if in the presence of canonized forefathers, the spirit of freedom, leading in itself to misrule and excess, is tempered with an awful gravity.





