That state admitted, and indeed led to, means of discovery and correction; whereas the system of coercion was likely to be permanent.
Edmund Burke: “That state admitted, and indeed led to, means of discovery and correction; whereas the system of coercion was likely to…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke contrasts the potential for discovery and correction in a free system versus the permanence of coercive systems.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
Governments must be abused and deranged indeed, before it can be thought of; and the prospect of the future must be as bad as the experience of the past.
So far is it from being true that we acquired a right by the Revolution to elect our kings, that, if we had possessed it before, the English nation did at that time most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their…





