Otherwise competence and power would soon be confounded, and no law be left but the will of a prevailing force.
Edmund Burke: “Otherwise competence and power would soon be confounded, and no law be left but the will of a prevailing force.”
Editor's note · Context
Burke warns that without clear distinctions between competence and power, law would be reduced to mere force.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
But the king of Great Britain obeys no other person; all other persons are individually, and collectively too, under him, and owe to him a legal obedience.
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.





