Revolutions were no longer necessary; succession supplied their places: and well the object agreed with the policy.
Edmund Burke: “Revolutions were no longer necessary; succession supplied their places: and well the object agreed with the policy.”
Editor's note · Context
He notes that political stability was maintained through succession rather than revolutions, aligning with the prevailing policy.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
But the king of Great Britain obeys no other person; all other persons are individually, and collectively too, under him, and owe to him a legal obedience.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
By adhering in this manner and on those principles to our forefathers, we are guided, not by the superstition of antiquarians, but by the spirit of philosophic analogy.
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…





