It has strong bipartisan support. As I will show in a few minutes, it strongly supports the idea of limiting what we call democracy by court decree. Limiting the idea of Federal courts running the Government has strong bipartisan appeal. It has strong support from the left and the right, because democracy by court decree interferes with democracy. It interferes with the ability of voters to elect officials who are accountable, and then throw them out if they don't like what they are doing. Consent decrees, which are judicial orders based on the consent of the parties engaged in civil court action, can be an effective judicial tool when drawn narrowly, and with respect to State and local policy choices. Congress passes legislation and sets conditions on grants that must be followed by State and local governments. When they are not followed, it is important for citizens to be able to turn to the court to see that their rights and the rule of law are upheld. That is the heart of the idea of federalism.
Douglas Alexander: “It has strong bipartisan support. As I will show in a few minutes, it strongly supports the idea of limiting what we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of limiting federal court influence on democracy.
Share
More from Douglas Alexander
I've always believed to be pro-Scottish, you don't need to be anti-English. We should be bigger and more generous than that.
As I recall, Senator McCain offered one amendment which almost all of us voted for, which was very targeted and cost about $400 billion, but he also offered another amendment which would have guaranteed that whatever was passed actually be…
Be assured, I wish our friends, our neighbours, and our sometimes-rivals well this evening at 8 o'clock.
I have received 600 e-mails and letters from Tennesseans in response to a request I put out asking them to share their personal stories about high gas prices. It has been my practice each week to put a few of those into the Congressional…





