He carried his scheme against the ignorance of the country, against the prejudice of the country, and against the standing prejudices of both branches of the legislature, who were steeped from the crown of the head to the sole of the foot in the strictest doctrines of contract.
John Morley: “He carried his scheme against the ignorance of the country, against the prejudice of the country, and against the…”
Editor's note · Context
Morley praises Gladstone's determination to push his legislative agenda despite widespread opposition and ignorance.
Share
More from John Morley
This is no mere case of barren wrangle and verbal recrimination.
I think any man who lays down a firm proposition that all is well, or any man who says that all is ill--either of those two men is probably wrong.
What I endeavoured to show was that King George III., without changing his opinion of the justice of his war against the colonies, was obliged to give it up on account of a change of public opinion, and was not open to blame for so doing.
Yet they had certainly no less value and truth than they ever had, and perhaps were more needed than ever in face of the present chaos of opinion.





