It is against fundamental maxims that an accomplice should be admitted as a witness: but accomplices are admitted from the policy of justice, otherwise confederacies of crime could not be dissolved.
Edmund Burke: “It is against fundamental maxims that an accomplice should be admitted as a witness: but accomplices are admitted from…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke emphasizes the importance of excluding accomplices as witnesses to maintain the integrity of justice.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The ceremony of cashiering kings, of which these gentlemen talk so much at their ease, can rarely, if ever, be performed without force.
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.





