But if the question was to be put to you and me,--Universal popular representation, or none at all for us and ours,--we should find ourselves in a very awkward position.
Edmund Burke: “But if the question was to be put to you and me,--Universal popular representation, or none at all for us and ours,--we…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke highlights the dilemma faced when choosing between universal representation and exclusion.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
Who could flatter himself that these men, suddenly, and as it were by enchantment, snatched from the humblest rank of subordination, would not be intoxicated with their unprepared greatness?
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
They have little regard to the obvious consequences of their doctrine, though they may see that it leaves positive authority in very few of the positive institutions of this country.





