He pursued a vehement and detailed opposition to it through all its stages, describing it as a measure contrary to the existing treaties between Great Britain and France, as a violation of the law of nations, and as an outrage on the Great Charter itself.
Edmund Burke: “He pursued a vehement and detailed opposition to it through all its stages, describing it as a measure contrary to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke criticizes the opposition to a bill aimed at removing French emissaries from Britain, highlighting its violation of international law.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
They look on the frame of their commonwealth, such as it stands, to be of inestimable value; and they conceive the undisturbed succession of the crown to be a pledge of the stability and perpetuity of all the other members of our…
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
The people of England will not ape the fashions they have never tried, nor go back to those which they have found mischievous on trial.
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.





