The interest of the people who are governed by them would not be their primary object,--perhaps a very small part of their consideration at all.
Edmund Burke: “The interest of the people who are governed by them would not be their primary object,--perhaps a very small part of…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke points out that the governed people's interests are not prioritized by their rulers.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
All your sophisters cannot produce anything better adapted to preserve a rational and manly freedom than the course that we have pursued, who have chosen our nature rather than our speculations, our breasts rather than our inventions, for…
As he is not to obey us, but we are to obey the law in him, our Constitution has made no sort of provision towards rendering him, as a servant, in any degree responsible.





