As there are now no hereditary honors and no distinguished families, why are we taxed to maintain what you tell us ought not to exist?
Edmund Burke: “As there are now no hereditary honors and no distinguished families, why are we taxed to maintain what you tell us ought…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke challenges the rationale for taxation in the absence of hereditary honors and distinguished families.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
So far is it from being true that we acquired a right by the Revolution to elect our kings, that, if we had possessed it before, the English nation did at that time most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their…
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
But the king of Great Britain obeys no other person; all other persons are individually, and collectively too, under him, and owe to him a legal obedience.





