It is true that this particular part of your general confiscation does not affect England, as a precedent in point; but the reason applies, and it goes a great way.
Edmund Burke: “It is true that this particular part of your general confiscation does not affect England, as a precedent in point; but…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke acknowledges that while a specific confiscation may not affect England, the underlying principle is still relevant.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Governments must be abused and deranged indeed, before it can be thought of; and the prospect of the future must be as bad as the experience of the past.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?





