When a man is to defend himself against a charge of crime, it is not instances of similar violation of law that is to be the standard of his defence.
Edmund Burke: “When a man is to defend himself against a charge of crime, it is not instances of similar violation of law that is to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke asserts that a defense against a crime should not rely on examples of other legal violations.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
All your sophisters cannot produce anything better adapted to preserve a rational and manly freedom than the course that we have pursued, who have chosen our nature rather than our speculations, our breasts rather than our inventions, for…
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?





