On the contrary, he admits that it was contracted in defiance of the Company's orders, without even the pretended sanction of any pretended representatives.
Edmund Burke: “On the contrary, he admits that it was contracted in defiance of the Company's orders, without even the pretended…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke points out the contradiction in acknowledging a debt that was incurred against the Company's orders.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Unquestionably there was at the Revolution, in the person of King William, a small and a temporary deviation from the strict order of a regular hereditary succession; but it is against all genuine principles of jurisprudence to draw a…
The engagement and pact of society, which generally goes by the name of the Constitution, forbids such invasion and such surrender.
By adhering in this manner and on those principles to our forefathers, we are guided, not by the superstition of antiquarians, but by the spirit of philosophic analogy.
The speculative line of demarcation, where obedience ought to end and resistance must begin, is faint, obscure, and not easily definable.





