Else it is very obvious that the intention of the law in refusing that right might be entirely frustrated, and the whole power of the legislature baffled.
Edmund Burke: “Else it is very obvious that the intention of the law in refusing that right might be entirely frustrated, and the whole…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that the law's intention must not be undermined by the absence of rights, stressing the importance of legislative power.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
Always acting as if in the presence of canonized forefathers, the spirit of freedom, leading in itself to misrule and excess, is tempered with an awful gravity.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?





