On the recordJanuary 1, 1790
When we look into the true nature of his authority, he appears to be nothing more than a chief of bumbailiffs, sergeants-at-mace, catchpoles, jailers, and hangmen.
Said by
Edmund Burke
Source
gutenberg.orgEdmund Burke: “When we look into the true nature of his authority, he appears to be nothing more than a chief of bumbailiffs…”
Editor's note · Context
From his critique of the French Revolution, Burke describes the diminished authority of the French King under the National Assembly.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Jan 1, 1790
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
Jan 1, 1790
This is the spirit of our Constitution, not only in its settled course, but in all its revolutions.
Jan 1, 1790
Always acting as if in the presence of canonized forefathers, the spirit of freedom, leading in itself to misrule and excess, is tempered with an awful gravity.
Jan 1, 1790
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.
Other voices in this conversation
