All are agreed that Parliaments should not be perpetual; the only question is, What is the most convenient time for their duration?--on which there are three opinions.
Edmund Burke: “All are agreed that Parliaments should not be perpetual; the only question is, What is the most convenient time for…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke discusses the consensus on the non-perpetuity of Parliaments, focusing on their duration.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
They have little regard to the obvious consequences of their doctrine, though they may see that it leaves positive authority in very few of the positive institutions of this country.
Unquestionably there was at the Revolution, in the person of King William, a small and a temporary deviation from the strict order of a regular hereditary succession; but it is against all genuine principles of jurisprudence to draw a…
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
Their objects would be enlarged with their elevation; but their disposition, and habits, and mode of accomplishing their designs must remain the same.





