They might disapprove; it was not necessary they should disavow him, as they have done in the whole and in all the parts of his book; because neither in the whole nor in any of the parts were they directly, or by any implication, involved.
Edmund Burke: “They might disapprove; it was not necessary they should disavow him, as they have done in the whole and in all the parts…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke explains that disapproval does not require a formal disavowal of a writer's work if there is no direct involvement.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The improvements of the National Assembly are superficial, their errors fundamental.
Not being illuminated with the light of which the gentlemen of France tell us they have got so abundant a share, they acted under a strong impression of the ignorance and fallibility of mankind.
But when the leaders choose to make themselves bidders at an auction of popularity, their talents, in the construction of the state, will be of no service.
Whatever they are, I wish my countrymen rather to recommend to our neighbors the example of the British Constitution than to take models from them for the improvement of our own.





