We are as far from being taken in by such miserable distinctions as we are incapable of making them.
Edmund Burke: “We are as far from being taken in by such miserable distinctions as we are incapable of making them.”
Editor's note · Context
Burke expresses his disdain for superficial legal distinctions that mislead the court.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
But the king of Great Britain obeys no other person; all other persons are individually, and collectively too, under him, and owe to him a legal obedience.
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
Though a king may abdicate for his own person, he cannot abdicate for the monarchy.





