Despotism does not in the smallest degree abrogate, alter, or lessen any one duty of any one relation of life, or weaken the force or obligation of any one engagement or contract whatsoever.
Edmund Burke: “Despotism does not in the smallest degree abrogate, alter, or lessen any one duty of any one relation of life, or weaken…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that despotism does not diminish the responsibilities inherent in social contracts, emphasizing the continuity of duty under tyranny.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
No experience has taught us that in any other course or method than that of an hereditary crown our liberties can be regularly perpetuated and preserved sacred as our hereditary right.
The speculative line of demarcation, where obedience ought to end and resistance must begin, is faint, obscure, and not easily definable.
Though a king may abdicate for his own person, he cannot abdicate for the monarchy.
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.





