I regret deeply that I cannot agree that this provision would bring the results expected.

You are all aware that I have held that this transfer ought to be made.

There may be an exception or two but in the main it applies to all the appointments.

If any reduction is to be applied to taxes, it is my own belief that it should be applied in that direction.

In the case of events that everybody knows will occur it ought either to be provided by law or not provided for at all.

The policy of restrictive immigration should be maintained.

The main reason for this has been the sound foundation on which it stands.

There isn't any division of the Cabinet over the policy that is being pursued in China.

To take on a permanent obligation of the nature that I understand is contemplated in the suggestion of President Diaz would be, I think, a little farther than this Government would wish to go.

Our Government stands also thoroughly committed to the policy of avoiding competition in armaments.

This may well be the starting point for a continuous fire prevention program extending over the entire country.

The speedy action that has been taken on the first four reservations I should think would indicate that there would be little, if any, difficulty in the 5th reservation.

So, as far as I am informed, I know of no reason for making any change in our policy.

Our Government has taken an attitude on that which I do not think will be changed.

The Railroad Labor Bill will we hope develop into a very important policy.

As a result of that policy there was very little of partisanship that was shown in the decision of any large questions.

The principal thing that will affect the country is the reduction of taxation.

Then the aviation bill was very important, which also is the adoption of a new policy of administration.