No one has given me a good argument on how we do some of the things that we're talking about without bankrupting the country.

It's the beginning of a conversation. It's going to take a while to figure out.

The one I'm looking for is how main street, how employees benefit without having to turn to the federal government.

It seems like the only ones winning in this whole equation would be big business, and big government.

It seems like the only ones winning in this whole equation would be big business, and big government.

When you enact bad policies, what do you expect? You get bad outcomes.

Debated Bernie Sanders on the floor, one of my most enjoyable moments since I've been in the Senate about the modern monetary theory.

I mentioned it many times here that regardless of our revenue--our tax rate, our revenues stubbornly stay around 18% of our GDP.

It begs the question, is our economy one that can ever be government centric when the stats seem to show otherwise?

I think that begs an important question. I've always advocated that businesses need to do more to invest in their own communities.

the so-called Inflation Reduction Act... has and will increase prices.

Experience shows us the best way to promote prosperity for all is through pro-growth policies that empower ordinary people rather than Washington.

No one has given me a good argument on how we do some of the things that we're talking about without bankrupting the country.

Instead of raising taxes like my Democrat colleagues, we lowered taxes across the board while making the tax code more progressive.

When you enact bad policies, what do you expect? You get bad outcomes.

I want to take off right where Senator Van Hollen left off.

Thank you. The second question would be involving Federal regulations.

This type of work is not unique to just Indiana. States like Colorado, Ohio, Oklahoma, who we will hear from today, are all leading in technology accessibility.