I think we need to understand that what we are dealing with now--the nature of the denuclearization challenge right now is not nonproliferation.

We need to start building this in steps.

We think we can solve the problems of health, of food, of energy, the list goes on and on.

We think we can solve the problems of health, of food, of energy, the list goes on and on.

I think that is the fundamental problem with our approach today is that we still continue to hold on to this notion that we can--that we have time.

I recognize--we all do--that the South Korean War--the Korean War was, rather, at the outset of the Cold War.

We need to consider something to deter further missile testing and we do not have anything that is doing that right now.

We cannot raise the economy of Latin America to a level that people do not want to come here.

We cannot raise the economy of Latin America to a level that people do not want to come here.

I think that is the fundamental problem with our approach today is that we still continue to hold on to this notion that we can--that we have time.

Spending money around the world to alleviate things that we wish would go away, but we are never going to get there, would only make sense, in my view, if it has a strategic significance for us.

this policy is a failure and has to change.

I think we need to be more--we need to take these lessons to heart and actually start to pull that process apart instead of looking for the big deal, at the end of the road kind of agreements.

The sanctions regime has been subject to a lot of leakage.

It is hard to imagine a place which is more technologically advanced than South Korea, that provides more products to the world than South Korea.

I believe our strategic interests and national security revolve around, if you will, China, Russia, authoritarian States versus ourselves.

It seems to be that we have gone from pillar to post, guardrail to guardrail.

as Senator Romney referenced.