We should never ever listen to people like that.

This is not scientific debate that they're taking us off the Internet.

This is not scientific debate that they're taking us off the Internet.

This virus showed up immediately, very transmissible in humans as if it had been preadapted in a lab.

This is about the business of science with China, this will disturb our relations with China if anybody questions this.

There's a lot of evidence that people within the intel agencies actually do believe that there is evidence that it came from the lab.

I ask unanimous consent (UC) to submit statements for the record from U.S. Right To Know, Open the Books America, First Legal, Frontiers of Freedom, and Dr. Alina Chan.

They believed it did not come from nature.

But arguing against that is they tested 90,000-some-odd animals, and there is no animal host that's been found.

This virus showed up immediately, very transmissible in humans as if it had been preadapted in a lab.

this is about the business of science with China, this will disturb our relations with China if anybody questions this.

There's a lot of evidence that people within the intel agencies actually do believe that there is evidence that it came from the lab.

That was actually coming from Nature at the time. We want you to doctor it up and even be more strong, because we are making a political point here.

The ones that have been vocal about this and talked a lot about have been the DOE, which has more scientists than any other agency in Washington, probably other than NIH. They have concluded that it did come from the lab.

This is not scientific debate that they're taking us off the Internet.

I know of no other example in modern scientific history or publications where a publication has come forward pronouncing with such authority that the lab leak is implausible.

We should never ever listen to people like that.

This is incredibly important and needs congressional oversight on the select agents, but also on the Gain-of-Function.