the so-called Inflation Reduction Act... has and will increase prices.

The one I'm looking for is how main street, how employees benefit without having to turn to the federal government.

I'll believe it when I see it, and hope that does work. But it looks like we're in trouble as a nation in my mind.

When you cut the rates, you take money away from the treasury, but generally your economic growth rate starts to go up a little bit.

Instead of raising taxes like my Democrat colleagues, we lowered taxes across the board while making the tax code more progressive.

I think that begs an important question. I've always advocated that businesses need to do more to invest in their own communities.

It begs the question, is our economy one that can ever be government centric when the stats seem to show otherwise?

When you enact bad policies, what do you expect? You get bad outcomes.

Debated Bernie Sanders on the floor, one of my most enjoyable moments since I've been in the Senate about the modern monetary theory.

Experience shows us the best way to promote prosperity for all is through pro-growth policies that empower ordinary people rather than Washington.

It seems like the only ones winning in this whole equation would be big business, and big government.

If you do offer your employees great pay and great benefits, you don't have turnover.

I want to take off right where Senator Van Hollen left off.

The markets would not allow that.

Illegals currently, I would say, are going to cost the country just trillions and trillions of dollars in net.

When one side of the aisle has chosen to get rid of the idea of having a secure border, I don't think that syncs up with the majority of Americans.

Illegals currently, I would say, are going to cost the country just trillions and trillions of dollars in net.

When one side of the aisle has chosen to get rid of the idea of having a secure border, I don't think that syncs up with the majority of Americans.