
I further ask that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The committee-reported amendment in the nature of a substitute was agreed to.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
16,100+·quotes on file

I further ask that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The committee-reported amendment in the nature of a substitute was agreed to.

I ask unanimous consent that the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and that the motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without…

I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to; that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table. The…

I ask unanimous consent that the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The bill, as amended, was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading and was read the third…

I know of no further debate on the bill, as amended. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate? If not, the question is, Shall the bill, as amended, pass? The bill (S. 4057), as amended, was passed.

I ask unanimous consent that when the Senate completes its business today, it adjourn until 10 a.m., Thursday, September 15, and that following the prayer and pledge, the morning hour be deemed expired, the Journal of proceedings be…

I ask unanimous consent that the bill be considered read a third time and passed and that the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The bill (S. 4235)…

I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of S. 4235 and the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The bill…

I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 465, S. 4057. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The bill clerk read as follows: A bill (S. 4057) to develop a…

if there is no further business to come before the Senate, I ask that it stand adjourned under the previous order. There being no objection, the Senate, at 6:06 p.m., adjourned until Thursday, September 15, 2022, at 10 a.m…

I ask for a third reading, and I know of no further debate on the bill. The bill was ordered to a third reading and was read the third time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. If there is no further debate on the bill, the bill having been read the…

I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 7500, which was received from the House and is at the desk. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The bill clerk read as…

I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar No. 346, S. 533. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The bill clerk read as follows: A bill (S. 533) to require a…

I have eight requests for committees to meet during today's session of the Senate. They have the approval of the Majority and Minority Leaders. Pursuant to rule XXVI, paragraph 5(a), of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the following…

I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. 764, submitted earlier today. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the resolution by title. The bill clerk read as follows: A resolution (S. Res. 764)…

I ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding rule XXII, the Senate consider the following nominations en bloc: Calendar Nos. 1137, 1138, and 1108; that the Senate vote on the nominations en bloc without intervening action or debate; that…

Why should rural Minnesotans have to wait for engineers from Silicon Valley to come fix a product they would happily fix themselves if given the chance?

The question of them is, would they put Roe v Wade into law? Would they correct the Supreme Court reversal of 50 years of precedent to simply say, women should be able to have the freedom to make their own decision about their health care…