When regulating something as high-risk and volatile as cryptocurrency, we should be comprehensive, not restrained.

If Congress is going to regulate cryptocurrency, we must make sure the solution is not worse than the problem.

I, along with Senator Cory Booker, have introduced the American Opportunity Accounts Act.

I hope that every effort is being made to monitor the Taylor Force Act conditions, that not any of the money should in any way go to benefit the terrorist families for the terrorists, suicide terrorists, who commit crimes.

The CFPB is helping Americans save money on their homes and their bank accounts and their medical bills.

I believe we need Federal reparations to close the racial wealth gap once and for all.

It is remarkable that the Commodity Exchange Act actually reads out of the law four major pieces of legislation that have been intrinsic to strengthening our markets.

The CFPB is helping root out junk fees, and because of that Americans are going to keep a little bit more money in their pockets.

If a bank needs to charge more than $8 to cover the actual cost of collecting missed payments, would the proposed rule permit that?

Without the CFPB, consumers' biggest financial investment...would be at risk, and the mortgage market would be in chaos.

That is going to mean 22.8 million consumers will have at least one medical collection removed from their credit reports.

But in the aftermath of all of that, some of this is Monday morning quarterbacking...

In my opinion, Congress should not be doing the work of wealthy investors in advancing toothless and feeble legislation that can make the problem of an unregulated crypto industry worse.

These fees cost families an estimated $12 billion a year, and earlier this year the CFPB proposed a rule to put a cap on unreasonable fees.

I do see baby bonds as the kind of investments that will break cycles of generational poverty.

Make no mistake. These overdraft reforms and the $5.5 billion in savings would never have happened without the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

OK. That sounds pretty reasonable to me. So if the banks want to charge more than $8, just come and show your math about why you are charging more than $8, and there is not going to be any problem here.

The only reason that corporations and their enablers have singled out the CFPB is because the agency doesn't do their bidding.