The same analysis determined that the In-Use Locomotive Regulation will require California to invest between $780-$830 million or up to $2.1 billion in added power capacity just in California.

you are voting in opposition to any fossil fuel projects.

It serves, not just as an answer, but a statement of the persisting injustice and disproportionate burdens placed on so many communities of color.

Dear Chairman Nehls, Ranking Member Wilson and Members of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials:

I was unable to attend the vote series today, due to an unexpected absence. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 336 and YEA on Roll Call No. 337. PERSONAL EXPLANATION

Let's keep moving forward. Let's not go back to the dark times.

California cannot ``need'' this regulation.

In my opinion, CARB, in their development of the regulation, did not consider the interplay of their regulation with previous public investments made to reduce locomotive emissions.

The industry's response to this regulation should not be to sue CARB.

According to CARB's own analysis, the rule would require both BNSF and Union Pacific to replace their entire fleet of locomotives nationwide to comply with the regulation, which will cost billions, with a B, billions of dollars, and will…

They've got to be more transparent.

While ABC recognizes the importance of maintaining environmental safeguards, CARB's regulatory overreach threatens America's contractors that work to deliver construction projects on time and on budget.

Mr. President, please look at what's happened, recognize that the reality out there may not be the same thing you're hearing from the circle of your closest friends and family and consider putting our country first.

I just feel that it's time for him to step aside if we were to be able to protect what he allowed us to gain in 2020, which was a victory for democracy.

I think rather than some tests here or there, what I'd like to see is the President out actively engaging with journalists like you, answering the tough questions, demonstrating that he doesn't need a teleprompter.

I don't know. What I do know is that we're at serious risk of our government being taken over by a criminal and his gang, the democracy values that we cherish so much being lost to an authoritarian strongman.

She's very able. She should be in the mix.

I represent the heart of a congressional district, once represented by Lyndon Johnson. Under very different circumstances, he made the painful decision to withdraw. President Biden should do the same.