Nothing less than an open invitation for the government to bypass the Constitution.

The Court’s decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution.

To allow the Government to enforce [the birthright citizenship executive order] against even one newborn child is an assault on our constitutional order.

the ruling was a travesty for the rule of the law and an open invitation to bypass the constitution.

I warned of the 'new legal regime' created by the Court’s decision.

The Government does not ask for complete stays of the injunctions, as it ordinarily does before this Court. Why? The answer is obvious: To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an…

rewarding lawlessness

Suppose an executive order barred women from receiving unemployment benefits or black citizens from voting.

Today, the threat is birthright citizenship.

a travesty for the rule of law

the majority invited open defiance of the Constitution

To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an impossible task

With the stroke of a pen, the president has made a 'solemn mockery' of our Constitution.

The gamesmanship in this request is apparent and the Government makes no attempts to hide it.

This Court endorses the radical proposition that the President is harmed, irreparably, whenever he cannot do something he wants to do.

No right is safe in the new legal regime the court creates.

The rule of law is not a given in this Nation, nor any other.

As every conceivable source of law confirms, birthright citizenship is the law of the land.