Any movement on the DPA provisions of the EO?

Current record exports by the United States are the result of the Trump Administration's successful policies, not the current Administration.

We want to make sure that the United States is the clear winner, the clear innovator in all technology, including AI.

Us not doing anything this Congress is a response to my colleagues across the aisle spending about $7 trillion last Congress.

Biden is promoting battery dependence on Chinese batteries, destroying American jobs.

I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I thank him for doing this Special Order hour on energy. Mr. Speaker, there is no national security without energy security. I didn't come up with that. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said…

Indeed, the Inflation Reduction Act, how irresponsible is that. Almost a trillion dollars to be used to subsidize Chinese batteries.

Good morning. Turn that frown upside down. It is going to be OK.

There is a lot at risk here, and we do not want our adversaries getting ahead of us.

It gives them, basically, broad authority to do whatever.

I know Dr. Lee is going to disagree here. So why does it not, in your opinion, because to me it is so obvious.

They do not have to follow U.S. law or regulation.

It is really costing Americans a lot. And so, we are struggling with our $34 trillion in debt.

the appeasement in Afghanistan was revealed with 13 Marines murdered at Abbey Gate who was solely the responsibility of Biden.

We do not want to stifle innovation. We do not want to stifle investment in AI or its innovation in any way, shape, or form.

I would never, ever, ever, ever want to see government regulation, government requirements stifle our ability for this American company to advance technology as fast as it has.

So basically, we took a problem and made it worse. It seems that way.

We should target those harms, we should treat those seriously, and we should deal with them.