
Because it was grossly inconsistent with the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
22,900+·quotes on file

Because it was grossly inconsistent with the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

We must remember that the primary purpose of our public markets is to foster economic growth.

These increased costs hinder the ability of American public companies to compete on a global scale, putting them at a disadvantage, while China's economic influence continues to grow.

What we are seeking is more accountability and transparency in the proxy process by the duopoly of proxy advisory firms testifying before us today.

It is not a 'get out of jail free' card, when you do not want to answer questions when you are under oath before a Committee who is considering you for a lifetime appointment to the Federal bench.

I would note that the Federal Election Commission is a bipartisan commission.

today, there are new revelations, new evidence about the extent of the radioactive contamination that has plagued the St. Louis area since the forties. Where did this radioactive contamination come from? Simple, it came from the Federal…

The Agencies wasted valuable time and resources by prioritizing the promulgation of a rule over the first two years of the Biden Administration; that is now clearly unlawful.

Letter from Sam Graves, Chairman, H. Comm. on Transp. and Infrastructure and Scott Perry, Chairman, Subcomm. on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Mgmt, H. Comm. on Transp. and Infrastructure to The Hon. Pete Buttigieg…

Millions of Americans are given only a single day--I think I expressed my concern that Alabama was one of four States that does not have any form of early voting.

This amendment is not germane. Provisions of the amendment fall within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Education and Workforce.

I would just like to note that for the record.

I would just like to note that for the record.

I oppose this amendment, as I do not believe it is the appropriate role for the Federal Government to take in elections administration.

It is definitely in line with free market capitalism to stop monopolies and duopolies created by the administrative state.

we absolutely need to level the playing field for workers and consumers.