That is also under active consideration and part of what will be addressed in the rulemaking.
If Federal dollars went into that exclusion, our view is that Federal dollars ought to go into something more fair this time around.
We are enthusiastic about passenger rail in general, high-speed rail in particular.
People right now feel--I look at Durham Report, and I called on the FISA violations. There's millions of Americans. It's like KGB but Durham...
I think you're probably a good American and you care.
A lot of good Americans from my district came here because they are sick and tired of this government not serving them.
This is a very important policy. It also represents the most comprehensive changes to date for the DBE program.
I will commit to speaking to the FAA about how to make sure that process is prompt, consistent of course with our responsibilities.
We know it's going to be a lot of private-sector work, too, but we've got to make sure we're doing our part with public policy.
Some of what I have seen in the runup to this debate has included provisions that would cut railroad safety inspections.
I think it's a great question. And maybe another area it turns out we have something in common is a belief that we ought to be paying more a...
That is nonsense, Representative.
If you took the wealth of the six richest Americans now. It's about $600 billion.
It's the beginning of a conversation. It's going to take a while to figure out.
I've always advocated that businesses need to do more to invest in their own communities.
That epic debate about where our economy comes from.
I want to take off right where Senator Van Hollen left off.
We care a great deal about community input and, yes, we believe that's an important consideration in these noise discussions.