Nor have I heard anybody saying that they want 105,000 less children cared for while their parents are at work.
I think that has a ramification. Because if you don't invest in those children, they become not necessarily taxpayers, but tax takers.
It was pretty lazy work, to be honest with you.
This is a hearing that so many of us have been looking forward to.
But this, the vision is that it would be in the hands of every blind student that wants to learn?
I'm particularly concerned about the People's Republic of China's Belt and Road Initiative and their footprint in South America, in particul...
These appropriation riders are essential to protect conscience.
And so we appreciate your testimony, and we look forward to working with the National Marrow Donor Program.
Even with the committee's generous increase of funding last year, the act only provides less than 30 cents for each of the country's 56 mill...
We must stop being so complacent about our adversaries' growing influence in our hemisphere.
What we are hoping is that the committee will be able to make an investment...$53,000,000 this year.
Let us show Will how Congress can take action and partner with us, work with NIH, and be a force for change to finally make progress on PANS...
The Javits Act remains the Federal Government's primary program to promote educational excellence and close excellence gaps.
The Chinese Communist Party [CCP] has long been expanding its influence in North and South America.
We need to take action to reverse that trend.
Funding restrictions are an important safeguard for taxpayers' conscience rights.
If you give us more authority and more resources, we could do more.
I have not heard anybody campaigning in America that says I want to have 200,000 less 3- and 4-year-olds in Head Start.
