So your conclusion would be that it really saves taxpayers' monies and efficient use of taxpayer' dollars.
I am told the cost of, well, this year's funding is $4 million, which seems to be a reasonable investment in such efficiency.
It also might trigger some of the tax incentives that are built in now for home energy efficiencies, which would be sort of a double benefit...
I find that somewhat disturbing. It seems to be entirely disruptive of not only the local housing market but the real estate market.
It looked like the rights of women were being deliberately removed from the equation by the Justices of the Supreme Court.
The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness is the only Federal agency that is exclusively devoted to alleviating homelessness.
I think this is another evidence-free effort to try to interfere with [energy] competition for their fossil fuel overlords.
I ask you to pull up your socks, do your job, look at these 501(c)(3)s and 501(c)(4)s.
It looks to me like you are completely falling short, that you have vacated the field.
the Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court posited something that I have no disagreement with, which is, that if big political spendi...
Political spending that is not transparent is corrupting.
Simple fairness is reason enough to end this rigged system.
The tax-dodging also blows a hole in our federal budget.
Senator Whitehouse's proposal and his sponsored legislation shows one promising path forward.
