They can do whatever they want.
We should target those harms, we should treat those seriously, and we should deal with them.
Us not doing anything this Congress is a response to my colleagues across the aisle spending about $7 trillion last Cong...
I think we can all learn something, probably from recent history, the FBI's interpretation of the Hunter Biden laptop as...
wouldn't it be better to have a microcosm of experiments?
But why the stampede? We are only just starting to grasp how AI can help and also harm humanity.
I want to thank our participants on the panel today. We appreciate your time, your insight and expertise.
They do not have to follow U.S. law or regulation.
I urge Congress to consider that we already have many proposals that have some bipartisan support.
Should we trust the government to be the ultimate arbiter of what is disinformation and what may cause social harm in AI...
the risk that we relinquish our current lead in AI to China, and that could have catastrophic implications for our milit...
A lot of these companies are global. I mean, could they not just move their development overseas outside the jurisdictio...
the new executive powers this EO asserts have no logical sunset.
Does anyone on the panel know if Commerce is doing anything related to this executive order?
Unnecessary new laws could stifle AI innovation, slowing the arrival of life-enhancing and lifesaving breakthroughs.
Let us focus on some specific targeted harms but not tech specific.
Just because Congress is unable to address AI as quickly as we should does not give the President the right to legislate...
We want to make sure that the United States is the clear winner, the clear innovator in all technology, including AI.
