We want to make sure that the United States is the clear winner, the clear innovator in all technology, including AI.
Good morning. Turn that frown upside down. It is going to be OK.
Biden is promoting battery dependence on Chinese batteries, destroying American jobs.
Unnecessary new laws could stifle AI innovation, slowing the arrival of life-enhancing and lifesaving breakthroughs.
They do not have to follow U.S. law or regulation.
There is a lot at risk here, and we do not want our adversaries getting ahead of us.
I would never, ever, ever, ever want to see government regulation, government requirements stifle our ability for this A...
But why the stampede? We are only just starting to grasp how AI can help and also harm humanity.
I think we can all learn something, probably from recent history, the FBI's interpretation of the Hunter Biden laptop as...
wouldn't it be better to have a microcosm of experiments?
I want to thank our participants on the panel today. We appreciate your time, your insight and expertise.
It gives them, basically, broad authority to do whatever.
I know Dr. Lee is going to disagree here. So why does it not, in your opinion, because to me it is so obvious.
Should we trust the government to be the ultimate arbiter of what is disinformation and what may cause social harm in AI...
A lot of these companies are global. I mean, could they not just move their development overseas outside the jurisdictio...
the risk that we relinquish our current lead in AI to China, and that could have catastrophic implications for our milit...
So basically, we took a problem and made it worse. It seems that way.
the new executive powers this EO asserts have no logical sunset.
