That would be very unusual, would it not?
The area of too big to fail, very important to a lot of us and I hope to you.
I supported the amendment.
There has got to be a balance, has there not?
I understand that you believe you were not legally required to hold panels for this rule because the Federal Reserve Boa...
I think the problem with the dispute is that you don't acknowledge you have a full duty to immediately respond.
As a military person, when somebody assumes command of a situation, altering the normal chain of command, that should be...
I would like to pursue the report issue, and the issue of the Chairman's--the allegation that the Chairman feels it is a...
You had a concern about it?
I would urge the majority, Madam Chairman, to understand that I believe this does--is divorced from policy differences.
I just don't believe that our problem here is policy difference.
One of the allegations is that the Chairman used his, introduced political considerations as part of his discussions wit...
I would just express my appreciation for those members who felt it necessary to raise with the White House the problems ...
I don't believe this is an issue, a disagreement over personality.
I strongly believe that the assumption of emergency powers after Fukushima was clearly in violation of law.
I think, Chairman, I don't necessarily agree with the summary analysis of that report as the Chairman expressed it.
Thank you, and Senator Carper, thank you for your wise advice to all of us.
I don't agree. I believe you are misinterpreting the plain statute.
