I look forward to working with you to learn more about this challenge, and perhaps review the evidence to ensure that that investment is really going to improve the circumstances of those who need it.

We must take concerted action to build peace and stability in these nations through any means possible.

We want to have as clear of an understanding as possible on what is really happening in each of these four countries.

I believe, based on today's testimony from earlier panels, that a case can definitely be made that the Saudis are, in fact, violating Customary International Humanitarian Law Rule 55.

They remind us we are talking about real people who need urgent help.

These are from the four famine countries.

I will continue to work tirelessly to ensure that all nations are contributing financially to end these global crises.

Some have suggested there is a large-scale problem with the theft of humanitarian aid at the Port of Hodeidah.

I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

It was not designed to be a trick question.

Were USAID funds used to purchase, as best you can tell here in this setting, these mobile cranes to replace those put out of service by the Saudi-led coalition?

I will want to ensure the Saudis get all the public credit or shame they deserve, depending on their decision.

The blockade is still in place to this day.

We cannot debate clearly the World Food Programme and other humanitarian agencies do not have the access that they need.

I am proud we have come together around this issue here, as you indicated, Republicans and Democrats, Congress, the administration.

For those who may not be as familiar with the situation in Yemen, or the geography there, why is the Port of Hodeidah so important to helping the millions of people in Yemen at risk of starvation?

Do you support the World Food Programme's request to have the four USAID-funded cranes delivered to Hodeidah?

Thank you for the late push for the diplomatic surge resolution that we have called for.