I do not have plans to vote on my nomination.

I do not know that I defer to the Southern Poverty Law Center as the final authority on who is a radical group.

I did criticize that. I was a politician, we had a campaign on.

I really would not attempt to comment today on that.

I would defend the statute, if it is reasonably defensible, yes. It is passed by Congress; it would be the duty of the Attorney General, whether they voted for it or support it, to defend it.

I think that is a very dubious practice. I would be cautious about it, and we would have to make sure it is justified.

But they cannot be denied access to education. The courts have decided that, as I understand it.

I believe the proper thing for me to do would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kinds of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton.

Today I am not sure women or people with different sexual orientations face that kind of discrimination. I just do not see it.

The antitrust policies of the United States have to be consistent and as clear as possible.

African Americans were being discriminated against systematically in voting.

The IDEA creates lawsuit after lawsuit, special treatment for certain children, and is a big factor in accelerating the decline in civility in classrooms all over America.

I believe my views on immigration are correct, just, decent, and right.

Tell me what you need and you'll have it.

The Solicitor General... has a duty, the Department of Justice does, to defend the laws passed by this body, by Congress.

He is a strong proponent of religious liberty, having sponsored or cosponsored several bills to prevent discrimination against the religiously observant.

The Voting Rights Act has eliminated that discrimination.

if Assange participated in violating the American law, then he is a person subject to prosecution and condemnation.