a travesty for the rule of law

This Court endorses the radical proposition that the President is harmed, irreparably, whenever he cannot do something he wants to do.

the ruling was a travesty for the rule of the law and an open invitation to bypass the constitution.

To allow the Government to enforce [the birthright citizenship executive order] against even one newborn child is an assault on our constitutional order.

The Court’s decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution.

I warned of the 'new legal regime' created by the Court’s decision.

I haven't seen a deal to which I can say yes.

The Government does not ask for complete stays of the injunctions, as it ordinarily does before this Court. Why? The answer is obvious: To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an…

the majority invited open defiance of the Constitution

Today, the threat is birthright citizenship.

To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an impossible task

rewarding lawlessness

[T]he parents of children covered by the Citizenship Order would be well advised to file promptly class-action suits.

He deserved it. He won.

As a leader of a city as diverse as New York City with 8 million people, as the largest Jewish population in the country, he should denounce it. And that’s it. Period.

This has been in my opinion the easiest budget that we had to pass.

That is more than any other major city in America.

This is a major step forward for our city.