the ruling was a travesty for the rule of the law and an open invitation to bypass the constitution.
Editor's note · Context
Sotomayor criticized the ruling as undermining legal principles and encouraging constitutional violations.
Share
More from Sonia Sotomayor
Down the other lies a chaotic election, held under a never-before-used congressional map that intentionally discriminates against Black Alabamians.
More people will turn back and be subjected to violence because of something they cannot or should not have to change about themselves, such as their race, religion, nationality, or political opinion.
Because the Court today errs by reducing the burden, at least in the sports context, that the Constitution places on state actors when classifying based on sex, I respectfully dissent.
You want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that’s exactly what they are. They are generating money from American citizens.





