That is why we need a national strategy to address pollutants like ozone.

EPA has an obligation to forge partnerships with States in order to make sure that everyone is doing their fair share.

If a job is worth doing, it is worth doing well.

I think that would be very helpful information.

I have a couple of questions here. For the entire panel, a question dealing with the importance of the heavy duty NOx rule.

I think we can, and I think we must.

Let me interrupt to say that our prayers are with you, Roger, and with your constituents. I can't imagine how hard that is.

Air is not partisan, respects no boundaries.

To me, that is not an undue burden on upwind States. It is basic fairness.

If I am trying to figure out what is the right thing to do, I try to put myself in other people's shoes.

EPA's science based rule has well defined economic and health benefits.

The Good Neighbor Rule is about basic fairness. It is about protecting Americans who are breathing dirty air that they didn't create.

Those who had the pollution control mechanisms didn't use them, they were able to provide cheaper electricity. That is just not fair.

For too long, many Americans living in downwind States have suffered in part because upwind neighboring States refuse to clean up their ozone pollution.

My hope is that we will be guided by science here, and at the end of the day we will be better prepared to deal with these issues in a fair and thoughtful way.

We need to be not blinded by science, we need to be guided by science.

We do punch way above our weight, exactly. Small but mighty.

I want to thank those who are here today from the Alzheimer's, our patient advocates, and others.