Several members of the Senate have asked me whether my research on the history of the Senate sheds light on the current debate over the role of the Senate with respect to President Bush's judicial nominations. Defining the right of extended debate is always tricky. If it is being used against you, it is a vicious weapon of obstruction, whose use in a democracy is unconscionable. If it is you who is using that weapon, it is a great one to have in your arsenal. Many times in America's history, the right of extended debate has been used to defend causes with which I profoundly disagree. In Master of the Senate, I tried to show how it was a last-resort, but very effective, barrier thrown up in the most ignoble of causes: the continuation of racial segregation.
William Pryor: “Several members of the Senate have asked me whether my research on the history of the Senate sheds light on the current…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of extended debate in the Senate regarding judicial nominations.
Share
More from William Pryor
I oppose the Cornyn amendment for several reasons, although I must say Senator Cornyn has been very fair in his dealings on this amendment. We have drafted a bill that contains a provision where the State attorneys general can enforce what…
In reflection of the New Year, I have thought about what I wanted my New Year's resolution to be. I had a wonderful holiday that I was fortunate to spend with my family, and I thought about those in the world who did not have that same…
Whatever the chief of staff's role with respect to state election administration does not include altering valid election results.
Johnnie Bryan Hunt died a couple of days ago in Arkansas. I just spoke with his wife a few moments ago. As always, she was delightful, and she was very upbeat and very positive and really appreciated all the prayers and all the well-wishes…