That is absolutely true. The Uruguay Round Agreements Act clearly establishes it is the obligation of the generic competitor to prove a substantial investment before the court. It is the court which determines whether or not a substantial investment has, in fact, been made. This is true for all industries today, except for one.
Discussing the obligations of generic competitors under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
Share
More from William Pryor
In reflection of the New Year, I have thought about what I wanted my New Year's resolution to be. I had a wonderful holiday that I was fortunate to spend with my family, and I thought about those in the world who did not have that same…
I wish to speak on an issue that is extremely important to families all across the country--consumer product safety. I have spent the past year working with several of my colleagues to reform and reinvigorate the agency charged with…
I rise in support of a very fine person whom President Bush has nominated to be on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. His name is Bobby Shepherd. He will replace a very outstanding circuit court judge named Morris Arnold who…
we are today, once again, starting the debate on the Consumer Product Safety reform bill. This is a very important piece of legislation, and I am sure Senators from all over the country have heard from their constituents about this because…