As I mentioned earlier, we are not in any way changing the URAA or GATT language. In fact, I look forward to the Senator from Pennsylvania offering language or an amendment to expedite the convoluted process contemplated in the substitute version. I emphasize again the reservations of the Department of Health and Human Services, regarding both the interminable delays in litigation and the unique, unattainable requirements imposed on generic competitors through the substitute version's unworkable definition of substantial investment. And as Professor Levin--I might say, probably known well by the Senator from Pennsylvania--of the University of Pennsylvania has concluded----
William Pryor: “As I mentioned earlier, we are not in any way changing the URAA or GATT language. In fact, I look forward to the Senator…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the URAA and GATT language in relation to a substitute version during Senate debate.
Share
More from William Pryor
Roe v. Wade was the, 'worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.'
As a former State attorney general and the ranking member of the Commerce Committee's Consumer Affairs, Product Safety, and Insurance Subcommittee, I have significant concerns with this approach. I believe the amendment proposes a…
I wish to follow up on something the two leaders were talking about a few minutes ago, and that is gas prices are a very serious issue in this country, certainly in my State. Everywhere I go in Arkansas, people ask me about it. I encourage…
No. First, the CPSC Reform Act bans lead in children's products beyond trace amounts. Under section 22, any children's product that contains lead ``shall be treated as a banned hazardous substance under the Federal Hazardous Substances…