No, my friend and colleague is mistaken. The present law says that a generic competitor may come onto the marketplace, even though the court has not resolved the issue of whether they have made substantial investment. If, hypothetically, after the generic competitor has entered the marketplace and competed with the patent holder, it is then determined by the court that a substantial investment has not been made, then the court imposes damages upon the generic competitor to render the patent holder whole.
William Pryor: “No, my friend and colleague is mistaken. The present law says that a generic competitor may come onto the marketplace…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of current law on generic competitors in the pharmaceutical market.
Share
More from William Pryor
let me say that I am very honored today to join my friends, Senator Salazar of Colorado and Senator Alexander of Tennessee, in their efforts to try to restore some nonpartisanship to our discussion on Iraq. I feel very strongly that we…
the names Ernest Green, Elizabeth Eckford, Gloria Ray Karlmark, Carlotta Walls LaNier, Minnijean Brown Trickey, Terrence Roberts, Jefferson Thomas, Thelma Mothershed Wair, Melba Pattillo Beals are part of Arkansas history and part of…
I do not think that I bring an agenda to the Commission. I hope that I bring relevant experience to the work of the Commission.
I oppose the Cornyn amendment for several reasons, although I must say Senator Cornyn has been very fair in his dealings on this amendment. We have drafted a bill that contains a provision where the State attorneys general can enforce what…