I regret that I must rise to oppose this amendment from my friend and colleague from Colorado. But this issue is of too great importance to the men and women who are fighting for our freedoms around the world. My colleague has characterized this as an Army versus the ranchers and farmers issue. I do not think this is our fighting men in the military versus farmers and ranchers, and here is why. Because I believe there are willing sellers and willing buyers in this particular instance. Private property owners, I have been told, approached the Army and said: Look, we have some land available we want you to consider in your plans to expand a needed training area, for the Army to consider looking at dealing with us and selling that land. So I think this particular proposal does not need to be an Army versus farmers and ranchers. I think this can be worked out with deliberation and thought during this process.
Wayne Allard: “I regret that I must rise to oppose this amendment from my friend and colleague from Colorado. But this issue is of too…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to military land use and its impact on local farmers and ranchers.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
We all know we are experiencing a time of dramatically increased energy costs. The price of gas sets new highs almost every day, and the price of oil continues to climb. In the face of this, the Democrats in this body think the proper…
This bill would create the country's first national OHV area, guaranteeing future access for off-highway-vehicle enthusiasts.
the IRS new guidance would force the AMA either to muzzle its advocacy efforts or lose its status as a tax-exempt organization.
homeownership has long been the American dream, and over the last decade record numbers of families have been able to achieve the dream of homeownership. Unfortunately, too many homeowners now find themselves in mortgages they can't…