Mr. President, today I file an amendment to provide for more public housing vouchers. The original intent of the Federal housing assistance program was to provide temporary housing to poor individuals and families. Since its inception, the Federal housing program has grown to become a $25 billion entity. In my view, the section 8 voucher program is the best means for low-income families to find secure, affordable rental housing. The section 8 certificate or voucher program first began in 1974 and has grown to serve over 1.5 million low-income families today. These families are empowered with the choice of where they want to live and are given the freedom to determine what surroundings they desire. Section 8 housing is the preferable means of providing affordable housing to low-income individuals. Vouchers enjoy wide support including past Republican and Democrat administrations alike. In fact, the current Secretary of HUD, Secretary Andrew Cuomo, supports an expanded voucher program. Vouchers are very popular, which is demonstrated by the 1.5 million families who are currently using vouchers or certificates. Vouchers empower individuals and promote competition within the public housing authority and within the community, thereby lowering costs and improving conditions for the residents. Vouchers or other alternatives can be less expensive than the current public housing program. They can save the Government money and improve conditions for the tenants.
Wayne Allard: “Mr. President, today I file an amendment to provide for more public housing vouchers. The original intent of the Federal…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for more public housing vouchers and their benefits for low-income families.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
my amendment will cut the Federal deficit and eliminated Government waste by reducing spending 5 percent on programs rated ``ineffective'' by the OMB and use the savings to pay down the Federal debt. Five percent is the expected increase…
I believe the Federal tax burden is excessive and overly intrusive. Reform of the IRS and the current tax system is long overdue. If our Democratic colleagues have their way, the Tax Code will continue to be excessive and overly intrusive…
I would withhold putting E15 on the market until the research has been conducted that would assure that motorcyclists... can use it without damage to the engine.
And we had the MTBE versus ethanol, and that was a big debate, and it was to reduce the air pollution.